![]() ![]() This makes it difficult to operate even for troops with medium-sized hands. Furthermore, the M9 has a safety/decocker on the slide rather than on the frame. It also makes it difficult to eject the magazine one-handed. In addition to the size and weight previously mentioned, the M9 has a large grip that troops with smaller hands can find difficult to hold in a solid shooting grip. The handgun exceeded the stringent requirements put forth by America’s elite operators, but it was large, heavy, and cumbersome. Army)Ī weapon can perform exceptionally, but if it’s difficult to use, then it loses its effectivenes. The safety actuates in the opposite direction of most pistol safeties because it is also a decocker (U.S. As the old Beretta is phased out, let’s take a look at why many troops won’t be mourning its departure. Designated the M17 and M18, the new SIGs are making their way into the armories and holsters of service members across the military as other branches followed the Army’s lead in adopting the new handguns to replace the M9. In 2017, the Army announced the winner of its Modular Handgun System competition and replacement for the M9 to be the SIG Sauer P320. ![]() It was the 92F’s lower price point that ultimately won Beretta the coveted contract. On top of this, the 92F, later designated the M9, was actually beat out by its competitor, the SIG Sauer P226, in the competition for the government contract. 45acp to the smaller 9x19mm, but the adoption of an Italian pistol over an all-American Colt just seemed plain wrong. Not only was the military dropping from the hard-hitting. military in 1985 was a controversial move. The replacement of the Colt M1911A1 with the Beretta 92F as the primary sidearm of the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |